Comments on: SharePoint Accessibility – Is MOSS 2007 accessible?

By: Itransition

Itransition — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:08:49 +0000

Looking forward to Sharepoint 2010 I suppose that MOSS acessibility will be maintained much better. I hope It will be well-integrated with W3S standarts in the field of websphere development and web portals development.

By: Public SharePoint Websites « Blog @ JodieM.com.au

Public SharePoint Websites « Blog @ JodieM.com.au — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:47:53 +0000

[...] the Accessibility Kit for SharePoint which is free with a valid SharePoint licence. This is a good article outlining the issues with the Accessibility features in [...]

By: Traveller_Adventure

Traveller_Adventure — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:50:19 +0000

Great post, really help me alot. Thanks.

Cheers,
Buat Duit Dengan Blog

By: Traveller_Adventure

Traveller_Adventure — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:49:34 +0000

This is quite impressive, I am pleased to read this post, keep posts like this coming, you totally rock!
Cheers,
Buat Duit Dengan Blog

By: MOSS 2007 Accessibility « Diganta Kumar

MOSS 2007 Accessibility « Diganta Kumar — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:23:08 +0000

[...] June 16, 2009 by Diganta Kumar http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/ [...]

By: SharePoint thoughts you would be interested in : SharePoint Accessibility Resources

Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:55:03 +0000

[...] accessible? – Provides a quick comparison of SPS 2003 and MOSS 2007 with Priority 1 requirements http://www.21apps.com/sharepoint/sharepoint-accessibility-is-moss-2007-accessible/ Article: Building ASP.NET 2.0 Web Sites Using Web Standards – Though, this article provides the [...]

By: Vince Rothwell

Vince Rothwell — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:53:31 +0000

Andrew,

I have now released ARF (http://www.spworks.co.uk/arf/accessibility.aspx), which makes creating accessible publishing sites much easier.

–Vince

By: Access Curmudgeon

Access Curmudgeon — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:26:00 +0000

Great article, but even after reading the comments I cannot reconcile your numbering with WCAG 1.0 Checkpoints! For example WCAG (both the March 1999 and final versions) stop at 1.5, but you have 1.6 – 1.9! (And that’s only the most obvious disconnect.) Can you please explain where your questions came from? Thanks!

By: Jag

Jag — Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:31:00 +0000

Andrew Nice article. Helped me in understanding on how SharePoint 2007 can tackle Accessibility requirements for my clients (especially those public sector ones!).

Note that URL for Microsoft Accessibility site for developers is broken. the latest one is http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/accessibility/default.aspx

Ta
Jag

By: Andrew Woodward

Andrew Woodward — Sat, 11 Aug 2007 08:25:00 +0000

Michael,

It appears that the WCAG article has been updated and the reference numbers seemto have changed!

The links in the post have been updated to point to the one they refer to http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990324/

For the updated list see

http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/full-checklist.html