Dealing with ineffective meetings

Any of these sound familiar

  • Meeting just ended up a talking shop, nothing was decided
  • I wish Steve would stop talking over me
  • I don’t know why I waste my time attending, no one listens to me
  • That is not what we decided!
  • Didn’t we agree to do this?
  • Why can we never reach agreement on anything

You are not alone, there are many reasons why meetings aren’t effective and many more reasons why people and organisations struggle to deal with complex issues effectively.

If you think about SharePoint Governance how many meetings and discussions do you have to come to agreement on something. Even the seemingly simple decisions like the guidance on sub site creation has a number of threads to discuss

  • What is the general guidance
    • Why?
  • What are the allowed exceptions?
  • How is it managed?
  • How is it enforced?
  • How do we communicate it?
  • What about migrated content?

The same conversation will likely take place for most of the aspects of the SharePoint Governance – some being easier to define than others.

How effective was the meeting?   Watch the video below to see an example of a more effective meeting.

Want to know more?

Learn Issue Mapping in the UK

21apps have the pleasure of bringing Paul Culmsee to the UK in October to teach this course for the 1st time in Europe.

Paul is one of only three Cognexus Certified Dialogue Mappers in the world and commonly performs mapping in non IT disciplines as diverse as healthcare, urban planning and large scale construction projects. It is this collaborative work on highly complex problems where many of the insights for the SharePoint governance and information architecture class was conceived.

Specialising in the SharePoint platform, he is a Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer, Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist, Microsoft Certified Trainer and Certified Information Systems Security Professional. Paul is well known in the SharePoint community for his strategic focus on SharePoint delivery, his writings on wicked problems and information architecture. His popular blog, (cleverworkarounds.com) receives over 20,000 unique visitors and 1.2 million hits per month.

He is a regular international conference speaker in IT and non IT circles and is a sought after trainer and advisor.

Paul has just finished co-authoring “The heretic’s guide to best practices” with Kailash Awati. To find out more about this book, visit the Heretic’s Guide Books.

Blog | Twitter

UK: Solving Complex Problems with Issue Mapping

Wednesday, October 17, 2012 at 9:00 AM – Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 5:30 PM (BST)

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Eventbrite - UK: Solving Complex Problems with Issue Mapping

This entry was posted in Events, Governance, SharePoint and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.butterknife-marketing.com Avi Kaye

    I loved the video :) A really excellent way of presenting the information clearly – I’d love to see that in action in a real live meeting.

    By the way, points 3-6 that you raised all stem from the same root issue – people don’t write down decisions or tasks, and even if they do, those decisions aren’t passed on to everyone at the end of the meeting. So deciding, for example, which is better, feature A or feature B, can take three meetings – even though you’ve all decided in the first meeting that feature B is far superior. And of course, there’s a Dilbert about that :)

    http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2004-04-04/ 

    AviK
    http://meetingking.com