<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The cost of Test Driven Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.21apps.com/development/cost-of-tdd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.21apps.com/development/cost-of-tdd/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:26:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The cost of Test Driven Development - Helper Code</title>
		<link>http://www.21apps.com/development/cost-of-tdd/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>The cost of Test Driven Development - Helper Code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.21apps.com/?p=883#comment-817</guid>
		<description>[...] I found that Andrew Woodward has wrote a review of my post on his blog. Where he called it &quot;A short and to the point [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I found that Andrew Woodward has wrote a review of my post on his blog. Where he called it &quot;A short and to the point [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewWoody</title>
		<link>http://www.21apps.com/development/cost-of-tdd/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewWoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.21apps.com/?p=883#comment-816</guid>
		<description>Liam, I agree with you about the visibility of costs.  I also think the problem is emphasised by the way contractors or partners are used.  They generally only have an interest in the immediate delivery, not the longer term when they may not be the people doing the work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liam, I agree with you about the visibility of costs.  I also think the problem is emphasised by the way contractors or partners are used.  They generally only have an interest in the immediate delivery, not the longer term when they may not be the people doing the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam McLennan</title>
		<link>http://www.21apps.com/development/cost-of-tdd/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam McLennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.21apps.com/?p=883#comment-815</guid>
		<description>Part of the problem is that the cost is exposed, but the benefit is not. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wrote a little bit about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://hackingon.net/post/Test-Driven-Development-Return-on-Investment.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://hackingon.net/post/Test-Driven-Developme...&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the problem is that the cost is exposed, but the benefit is not. </p>
<p>I wrote a little bit about it <a href="http://hackingon.net/post/Test-Driven-Development-Return-on-Investment.aspx" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://hackingon.net/post/Test-Driven-Developme.." rel="nofollow">http://hackingon.net/post/Test-Driven-Developme..</a>..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
