Comments on: Unit Testing SharePoint – Getting into the Object Model

By: AndrewWoody

AndrewWoody — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:59:07 +0000

Thanks Mike, I'm a big user of Resharper – some great stuff in VS2005/2008. Although I'm not as convinced in VS2010 as I think it sometimes trys to do too much.

By: Mike Blake

Mike Blake — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:02:52 +0000

It looks really promising. I would also recommend Resharper to help you refactor code and generate classes etc.

By: itjobs1

itjobs1 — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:55:59 +0000

Thanks for this article it's great! &interesting subject
www.staffingpower.com

By: Reza Alirezaei’s Blog » MVPs by MVPs in 2008

Reza Alirezaei’s Blog » MVPs by MVPs in 2008 — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:33:53 +0000

[...] 11)Andrew Woodward:http://www.21apps.com/agile/unit-testing-sharepoint-getting-into-the-object-model/12)Jake Dan Attis : [...]

By: SharePoint and Unit Testing « iSea

SharePoint and Unit Testing « iSea — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:38:25 +0000

[...] http://www.21apps.com/agile/unit-testing-sharepoint-getting-into-the-object-model/ [...]

By: Isolator for SharePoint « Solutionizing .NET

Isolator for SharePoint « Solutionizing .NET — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:35:46 +0000

[...] model. However, Andrew Woodward recently posted a whitepaper on the subject that caught my eye: Unit Testing SharePoint Solutions – Getting into the Object Model. Featured in the paper is Typemock Isolator, which has just been released in a special [...]

By: Garth

Garth — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:41:50 +0000

Here’s some sample code of the Natural Mocks I’m using now (nothing worse than a posting that says I’ve got it working an no sample code )

/////////////////////////////////////////////////
SPList list = RecorderManager.CreateMockedObject();
SPListItem item = RecorderManager.CreateMockedObject();
using (RecordExpectations recorder = RecorderManager.StartRecording())
{
recorder.ExpectAndReturn(list.GetItemById(1), item);

recorder.ExpectAndReturn(item["ID"], 1);
recorder.ExpectAndReturn(item["Customer Name"], “Bob Jones”);
recorder.ExpectAndReturn(item["NumberOfItems"], 2);

}

By: Garth

Garth — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:24:13 +0000

Cool. Thanks for the response. I’m using Natural Mocks for this instance and it’s working.

Shotto

By: Doron

Doron — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:11:04 +0000

@Garth,

This is indeed a missing feature in Typemock Isolator – we don’t handle conditional expectations correctly with our AAA API. This feature is supported by our older APIs (see the discussion on the Isolator forums here: http://www.typemock.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=1030&highlight=).

We are working on extending the AAA API with more features like this one, so you can pretty safely assume you’ll get it in an upcoming version.

Doron (developer, Typemock)

By: Garth

Garth — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:07:26 +0000

Thanks for this article it’s great!

I’m having a bit of a funny happening in my code and I was wondering if it’s me or the the API.

I’ve set up the following:
// ———————————————————-
SPList list = Isolate.Fake.Instance(Members.ReturnRecursiveFakes);
SPListItem item = Isolate.Fake.Instance(Members.ReturnRecursiveFakes);

Isolate.Swap.NextInstance().With(list);
Isolate.Swap.NextInstance().With(item);

Isolate.WhenCalled(() => list.GetItemById(1)).WillReturn(item);
Isolate.WhenCalled(() => item["Customer Name"]).WillReturn(“Bob Jones”);
Isolate.WhenCalled(() => item["NumberOfItems"]).WillReturn(2);
// ———————————————————-
However when I call item["Customer Name"] the mock object returns ’2′ instead of ‘Bob Jones’ it appears to be ignoring the field name set in the item[] and just returns the last value that was set with ‘WhenCalled()’.

Have I set this up incorrectly?
Thanks